DISS Disciplines and Ideas in the Social Sciences HUMSS (CNHS) Calubian National High School Senior high School
CLICK HERE – Learning Competency 3rd Grading
- define Social Sciences as the study of society HUMSS_DIS 11- IIIa-1
2. distinguish Social and Natural Sciences and Humanities HUMSS_DIS 11- IIIa-2
3. compare and contrast the various Social Science disciplines and their fields, main areas of inquiry, and methods HUMSS_DIS 11- IIIb-d-3
4. trace the historical foundations and social contexts that led to the development of each discipline HUMSS_DIS 11- IIId-4
4.1 Structural-Functionalism
4.2 Structuralism
5. determine manifest and latent functions and dysfunctions of sociocultural phenomena HUMSS_DIS 11 -IIIe-f-1
6. Marxismanalyze social inequalities in terms of class conflict HUMSS_DIS 11-IIIg-2
7. Symbolic Interactionismappraise the meanings that people attach to everyday forms of interaction in order to explain social behaviour. HUMSS_DIS 11-IIIh-3
8. Psychoanalysisanalyze the psychodynamics of the person’s personality in terms of Id, Ego, and Superego HUMSS_DIS 11-IIIi-5
CLICK HERE – 3rd Grading Topics
DISS – Disciplines and Ideas in the Social Sciences (HUMSS)
DISS (Disciplines and Ideas in the Social Sciences) is a core subject in the Humanities and Social Sciences (HUMSS) strand of Senior High School. It introduces students to the major disciplines, concepts, and perspectives of the social sciences, helping them understand society, culture, politics, and human interactions.
Objectives of the Subject
- To understand the structure and dynamics of society
- To develop critical and analytical thinking skills
- To apply social science theories to real-life social issues
- To enhance skills in research, analysis, and interpretation
Social sciences represent a broad field of academic disciplines focused on the study of human behavior, social interactions, and the dynamics of societies. This expanse includes various fields such as sociology, psychology, anthropology, and economics, among others. Each of these disciplines examines distinct aspects of human existence, from individual psychological processes to the complexities of social structures and cultural norms. By analyzing these elements, social sciences provide invaluable insights into how people relate to one another and navigate their environments.
The importance of social sciences lies in their ability to contextualize and interpret the myriad factors that influence human behavior. Through rigorous research methodologies, social scientists strive to uncover patterns and trends that can explain social phenomena, thereby enhancing our understanding of cultural diversity and societal challenges. This knowledge is essential not only for academic purposes but also for practical applications in areas such as policy-making, education, and community development.
In the educational sphere, the Humanities and Social Sciences (HUMSS) strand plays a pivotal role in cultivating critical thinking and empathy among students. This strand encourages learners to engage deeply with the principles and perspectives of social sciences, fostering an appreciation for human narratives and social contexts. By exploring various themes from historical trajectories to contemporary societal issues, students are equipped with the analytical skills necessary to navigate an increasingly complex world. Thus, the HUMSS strand not only broadens academic horizons but also prepares students for active participation in civic life, emphasizing the relevance of social sciences in everyday decision-making and societal cooperation.
Key Disciplines within Social Sciences
Social sciences comprise a wide array of disciplines that study human behavior, societies, and their complex interactions. Each of these fields plays a crucial role in understanding the various dimensions of human life and the structures that govern societies. Among the most prominent disciplines are sociology, psychology, political science, economics, and anthropology.
Sociology focuses on the study of societies, social institutions, and social relationships. It explores how these elements influence human behavior and societal dynamics. Sociologists utilize various research methods to analyze social phenomena, examine patterns of social interaction, and investigate how larger social forces impact individual lives.
Psychology delves into individual and group behavior by studying mental processes, emotions, and the cognitive functions of humans. This discipline seeks to understand how thoughts and feelings influence behavior, with implications ranging from psychological health to educational practices. Clinical psychology, developmental psychology, and social psychology are some branches within this vibrant field.
Political science examines the theory and practice of politics, understanding the structures, processes, and behavior associated with governance. This discipline tackles the analysis of political systems, political behavior, public policies, and international relations, offering insights into power dynamics and the functioning of government institutions.
Economics investigates the production, distribution, and consumption of goods and services. This field breaks into two main branches: microeconomics, which addresses individual and business decision-making processes, and macroeconomics, which studies aggregate economic indicators and the overall economy. Economists seek to understand how resources are allocated and the factors that affect economic performance.
Lastly, anthropology studies human societies, cultures, and their development. This discipline emphasizes the significance of cultural variation and focuses on understanding social practices, beliefs, and customs across different populations. By exploring the diversity of human experiences, anthropology enriches our comprehension of cultural context and social patterns.
The Interdisciplinary Nature of Social Sciences
Social sciences encompass a variety of disciplines that study human behavior, interactions, and societal structures. The interdisciplinary nature of these fields fosters collaboration, allowing researchers and practitioners to draw insights from multiple areas, leading to a more nuanced understanding of complex societal issues. This synergy is particularly crucial in addressing global challenges such as poverty, climate change, and social inequality.
For instance, the intersection of economics and sociology can illuminate the ways in which economic policies affect social dynamics and vice versa. Researchers may analyze how economic inequality correlates with social mobility, providing valuable insights for policymakers aiming to create more equitable opportunities. Similarly, integrating psychology with political science can help explain voter behavior, offering a comprehensive view that can enhance electoral strategies.
Another significant example of interdisciplinary research within social sciences can be found in the field of environmental studies, which often combines insights from geography, economics, and sociology. Such interdisciplinary approaches allow us to assess the social dimensions of environmental issues, such as community responses to climate change initiatives or the impact of environmental degradation on marginalized populations. When disciplines are integrated, the resulting framework can better capture the interrelatedness of environmental, social, and economic factors.
This collaborative spirit not only enriches academic inquiry but also equips practitioners with the tools to formulate holistic solutions to contemporary challenges. As global issues become increasingly complex, recognizing and embracing the interdisciplinary nature of social sciences is more critical than ever. The overlapping domains within social sciences enable a multifaceted approach, paving the way for comprehensive strategies that reflect the diverse experiences of individuals and communities.
Important Theories in Social Sciences
The field of social sciences is enriched by a variety of theories that provide frameworks for understanding human behavior and societal dynamics. Among these, social constructivism, conflict theory, and behavioral theories stand out as significant contributors to our comprehension of social phenomena.
Social constructivism posits that human beings create knowledge and meaning through their interactions within society. This theory emphasizes that our understanding of reality is a product of social processes and cultural contexts. By highlighting the role of language, social norms, and collaborative understanding, social constructivism aids in exploring how individuals from different backgrounds interpret their experiences and the world around them. This perspective is particularly relevant in examining educational practices and communication patterns in diverse environments.
In contrast, conflict theory offers a critical lens that focuses on the inherent conflicts within society, primarily driven by the distribution of resources and power. This theory, rooted in the works of Karl Marx, asserts that societal structures are shaped by competing interests, often leading to inequality and social change. Conflict theory remains crucial in analyzing issues such as class struggles, racial dynamics, and economic disparities, as it underscores the significance of power relations in shaping social institutions and individual experiences.
Behavioral theories, meanwhile, draw attention to the measurable actions of individuals and the stimuli that influence these behaviors. Focused on empirical research, behavioral theories aim to predict and understand how actions are shaped by environmental factors, reinforcement, and past experiences. This approach is particularly applicable in fields such as psychology and sociology, where understanding behavior patterns is essential for developing interventions and policies that address social issues.
Each of these theories plays a vital role in the tapestry of social sciences, offering valuable insights into the complexities of human behavior and societal structures.
Methodologies Used in Social Sciences
The social sciences leverage a variety of methodologies to understand complex human behaviors and societal structures. Amongst these methodologies, two primary approaches are dominant: qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitative research focuses on understanding underlying reasons, opinions, and motivations. This approach often employs methods such as interviews, focus groups, and ethnographic studies, which allow researchers to gain intricate insights into the subject matter.
On the other hand, quantitative research emphasizes statistical analysis and the collection of numerical data. This method incorporates surveys, experiments, and observational studies, providing researchers with measurable evidence to support or refute hypotheses. Both qualitative and quantitative methodologies hold a significant place in social science as they offer distinct yet complementary perspectives that enrich research findings.
The importance of ethics in research cannot be overstated, particularly in social sciences where human subjects are involved. Researchers must adhere to ethical standards that protect participants’ rights and welfare. This involves obtaining informed consent, ensuring confidentiality, and minimizing any potential harm during the research process. Ethical considerations are paramount as they not only shape the integrity of research but also influence the trustworthiness and reliability of study outcomes.
The implications of choosing different methodologies can greatly affect the conclusions drawn from any social science study. For example, qualitative methods may yield rich contextual understanding but can lack generalizability. Conversely, quantitative methods can provide broader data representation but may miss nuanced human experiences. Therefore, it becomes essential for researchers to carefully consider their methodological approach to ensure that it aligns with their research questions and objectives, ultimately guiding them towards credible and significant findings in the field of social sciences.
Applications of Social Sciences in Real Life
The social sciences encompass a wide range of disciplines that study various aspects of human behavior and societal structures. The insights gleaned from these disciplines are instrumental in shaping policies, educational practices, healthcare systems, and community development initiatives. One prominent application of social sciences is in the realm of policy-making. By utilizing research findings from disciplines such as sociology and psychology, policymakers can better understand the needs and behaviors of different populations. This understanding enables them to create evidence-based policies that address societal issues effectively.
In education, social sciences play a crucial role in curriculum development and teaching methodologies. Educators apply principles from educational psychology and anthropology to foster inclusive learning environments that cater to diverse student needs. For instance, theories of developmental psychology can guide teachers in implementing age-appropriate pedagogical strategies that enhance student engagement and learning outcomes.
Moreover, the application of social sciences in healthcare is increasingly recognized. Healthcare professionals leverage knowledge from sociology and public health to promote community health initiatives and understand health disparities. By analyzing data on social determinants of health, practitioners can develop targeted intervention programs aimed at vulnerable populations, thereby improving overall health outcomes.
Community development initiatives also benefit from the insights provided by social sciences. Urban planners, for example, employ methods from environmental psychology and sociology to design spaces that promote community interaction and social cohesion. The analysis of community dynamics helps in the creation of programs that empower residents, foster economic growth, and enhance the quality of life. Through these examples, it is clear that the applications of social sciences are vast and critical in addressing complex societal challenges, ultimately leading to more informed and effective solutions.
Current Trends and Issues in Social Sciences
The landscape of social sciences is continually evolving, influenced by various contemporary trends and pressing issues. One of the most significant contemporary trends is globalization, which has reshaped our understanding of social, economic, and political interactions across the globe. This interconnectedness leads to a complex array of challenges, such as economic disparities and cultural homogenization. Social scientists now face the task of critically analyzing these patterns to understand how they affect different communities and cultures.
In recent years, social justice movements have gained momentum, bringing to the forefront issues such as racial inequality, gender discrimination, and LGBTQ+ rights. These movements demand a re-evaluation of longstanding social structures and compel social scientists to engage with activism in their research. By integrating the voices of marginalized communities, scholars can contribute to more equitable solutions and promote social change. This trend is reflective of an overall shift within the social sciences towards inclusivity and advocacy.
Moreover, the impact of technology on society cannot be overlooked, as it continues to shape human interactions and behavior. The rise of social media platforms has changed how individuals communicate, mobilize, and engage with one another, leading to both positive collaborations and detrimental effects such as misinformation. As a result, social scientists must adapt their methodologies and theoretical frameworks to effectively study these digital phenomena. This trend highlights the need for interdisciplinary approaches that draw from fields such as communication studies and information technology.
As we delve deeper into the social sciences, it becomes evident that understanding contemporary trends and issues is crucial for fostering meaningful debates and creating informed policies. Keeping abreast of ongoing dialogues within the field allows for a nuanced appreciation of societal changes and the challenges that lie ahead.
Future Directions for Social Sciences
The landscape of social sciences is evolving rapidly, largely influenced by technological advancements and emerging global challenges. As societies grapple with complexities brought about by the digital age, disciplines within social sciences are increasingly integrating modern methodologies and interdisciplinary approaches. One of the significant emerging areas is digital sociology, which investigates how digital technology impacts social interactions, institutions, and structures. This field explores the relationship between social media, online communities, and their effects on individuals and society at large, shedding light on phenomena like polarization, identity formation, and collective behavior in virtual environments.
Another critical area gaining traction is climate psychology, which examines the psychological dimensions of climate change and environmental challenges. This discipline seeks to understand how individuals and communities perceive, respond to, and engage with climate-related issues. It addresses vital questions about motivations for pro-environmental behavior, the psychological impacts of climate change, and the effectiveness of communication strategies in raising awareness and prompting action.
Moreover, the advent of artificial intelligence is reshaping social research methodologies. AI tools can analyze vast amounts of data, recognizing patterns and predicting trends that were previously difficult to discern. This capability not only enhances the efficiency of research but also opens new avenues for understanding complex social phenomena, including migration patterns, public health responses, and economic behaviors. The integration of AI into social sciences invites a necessary dialogue about the ethical implications of such technologies and the responsibilities researchers hold in their application.
In summary, the future of social sciences appears to be marked by innovation and adaptability. As these fields converge with technology and respond to pressing global challenges, they will foster a deeper understanding of human behavior and societal dynamics. Continuous exploration in areas like digital sociology, climate psychology, and the role of artificial intelligence promises to enrich the discourse and expand the relevance of social sciences in addressing contemporary issues.
The Importance of Social Sciences in Society
Social sciences play a pivotal role in shaping our understanding of the intricate dynamics that guide human behavior and societal structures. By studying disciplines such as sociology, psychology, and political science, individuals gain valuable insights into the complexities of social interactions, cultural norms, and the various factors that influence decision-making processes. This knowledge is essential for fostering empathy and enhancing communication across diverse populations.
Moreover, the relevance of social sciences extends beyond academics; it is indispensable in addressing contemporary issues such as inequality, mental health crises, and civic engagement. As societies become more interconnected, the ability to analyze and interpret social trends and phenomena becomes increasingly crucial. Social scientists equip individuals and policymakers with the tools necessary to understand these trends, facilitating informed decisions that can lead to constructive social changes.
Investing in social sciences ensures that future generations will be equipped with critical thinking skills and a comprehensive understanding of the societal challenges we face. The disciplines within the social sciences encourage curiosity, creativity, and a commitment to continuous learning. By nurturing these fields, we allow for a richer discourse about what it means to live and coexist within a dynamic and often challenging social landscape.
In fostering an appreciation for social sciences, society not only cultivates informed citizens but also nurtures engaged individuals ready to contribute to a more equitable and informed world. Ultimately, the significance of understanding social sciences lies in their capacity to illuminate the pathways to a better future, where collaborative efforts lead to the resolution of pressing social issues.
What is Social Science:
social science is the scientific study of human society and social relationships. It seeks to understand how societies work, how people interact, how cultures develop, and how economies function.
How is it “Scientific”?
This is a key question. Social science is scientific because it uses systematic, evidence-based methods to develop and test theories. However, studying people is different from studying chemicals, so the methods are often adapted.Common Research Methods:
- Quantitative Methods: Using numbers and statistics. (e.g., large-scale surveys, analysis of census data, experiments).
- Qualitative Methods: Using words, descriptions, and in-depth understanding. (e.g., interviews, focus groups, ethnographic observation).
- Mixed Methods: Combining both quantitative and qualitative approaches.
Major Disciplines in DISS
1. Sociology
- The study of society, social relationships, and institutions
- Topics include family, education, religion, social class, and inequality
2. Anthropology
- The study of human culture and human evolution
- Focuses on traditions, beliefs, customs, language, and ways of life
3. Political Science
- The study of government, power, and political systems
- Topics include the state, governance, democracy, and citizens’ rights
4. Economics
- The study of production, distribution, and consumption of resources
- Covers scarcity, supply and demand, poverty, and economic development
5. History (Related Discipline)
- The study of past events to understand the present and guide the future
- Helps develop national identity and social awareness
6. Human Geography
- The study of the relationship between people and their environment
- Topics include population, migration, and urbanization
Key Ideas and Concepts
- Culture – shared beliefs, values, practices, and traditions of a group
- Socialization – the process by which individuals learn societal norms
- Power and Authority – the ability to influence and the legitimacy to lead
- Social Inequality – unequal access to resources and opportunities
- Identity – personal and collective sense of self
- Globalization – increasing interconnectedness of countries and societies
Disciplines of Social Sciences
- Anthropology
- Archaeology
- Communication Studies
- Demography
- Economics
6.Political Science - Psychology
- Geography
- History
- Linguistics
- Law
- Sociology
- Anthropology: The study of humanity, including its origins, development, and cultures. It has sub-branches like cultural anthropology, archaeology, linguistic anthropology, and biological anthropology. “father of anthropology” is often attributed to Franz Boas.
- Archaeology: The study of past human societies through the excavation and analysis of material remains.
- Communication Studies: The study of human communication processes, including interpersonal, group, and mass communication.
- Demography: The statistical study of human populations, including their size, composition, and distribution.
- Economics: The study of how societies allocate scarce resources to satisfy human wants and needs. It includes
-Microeconomics (individual behavior) and macroeconomics (aggregate economy).
-Macroeconomics
6.Political Science: The study of political systems, government, and political behavior. It covers topics such as political theory, public policy, and international relations.
- Psychology: The study of the human mind and behavior. It includes various subfields like clinical psychology, cognitive psychology, developmental psychology, and social psychology.
- Geography: The study of the Earth’s surface, including its physical features, human populations, and interactions between them. It includes physical geography and human geography.
- History: The study of past events and their significance. It involves analyzing historical sources and interpreting the past to understand the present.
- Linguistics: The scientific study of language, including its structure, history, and use.
- Law – Law is a system of rules and guidelines, usually enforced through a set of institutions, that shapes behavior in a society. It serves as a framework for resolving disputes, maintaining social order, and protecting individual rights and liberties. Laws are created through various processes, such as legislation, judicial decisions, and customs.
- Sociology: The study of social behavior, institutions, and structures. It examines topics such as social inequality, social change, and social interactions.
| Branch of Social Science | Father Figure |
| Anthropology | Franz Boas |
| Sociology | Auguste Comte |
| Economics | Adam SmithAlfred Marshall – modern microeconomicsJohn Maynard Keynes – Macroeconomics |
| Political Science | Aristotle |
| Psychology | Wilhelm Wundt – ModernSigmund Freud – |
| Geography | Eratosthenes |
| History | Herodotus |
| Archaeology | Ciriaco of Ancona |
| Linguistics | Ferdinand de Saussure |
| Communication Studies | Wilbur Schramm |
| Law | Aristotle – Father of natural lawHugo Grotius -Father of International LawSir Edward Coke – Father of rule of LawJustinian I – Father of Civil Law / Roman Law |
| Demography | John Graunt |
Table 5: According to Gans, 2020 the School of Psychology
School of Psychology
Structuralism
Functionalism
Psychoanalytic
Behaviorism
Cognitivism
Gestalt Psychology
School of Psychology and Proponents
1. Structuralism – Wilhelm Wundt and Edward Titchener
2. Functionalism – John Dewey, James Rowland Angell, and Harvey Carr. Founder: William James
3. Psychoanalytic – Sigmund Freud
4. Behaviorism – John Watson and B.F. Skinner (Burrhus Frederic Skinner)
5. Cognitivism – Ulric Neisser,
While Neisser is the primary proponent, cognitivism was also shaped by:
Jean Piaget – cognitive development in children
Noam Chomsky – language and mental structures (challenged behaviorism)
George A. Miller – memory and information processing (e.g., “7±2” rule)
- Gestalt Psychology
Max Wertheimer,
Wolfgang Kohler, and
Kurt Koffka
- Structuralism – Wilhelm Wundt and Edward Titchener
- Considered to be the firsts chool of thought in Psychology.
- This outlook focused onbreaking down mental processes into the most basic components.
- The focus was onreducingmental processes down into their most basic elements.
- The structuralists used techniques such as introspection to analyzetheinner processes of the humanmind.
Wilhelm Wundt – founder of Structuralism
Edward Titchener – developed introspection as a strict method
A student touches a hot stove and immediately pulls their hand away.
From a functionalist perspective, psychologists are not mainly interested in the structure of the sensation (heat, pain, nerve signals), but in what the experience does.
-The pain serves a function: it protects the individual by prompting quick withdrawal.
-The mental process (feeling pain) and the behavior (pulling the hand away) help the person adapt to the environment.
-The student learns from the experience and avoids touching hot stoves in the future, increasing chances of survival.
A student touches a hot stove and immediately pulls their hand away.
From a functionalist perspective, psychologists are not mainly interested in the structure of the sensation (heat, pain, nerve signals), but in what the experience does.
1. According to William James, consciousness is continuous and purposeful, helping people adjust to real-life situations.
2. John Dewey would explain this as a stimulus–response coordination, where thought and action work together.
3. James Rowland Angell emphasized that mental processes must be understood in terms of their usefulness.
4. Harvey Carr focused on how habits and learning help organisms function effectively in their environment.
- Psychoanalytic – Sigmund Freud
- Studies the unconscious mind.
- This school of thought emphasized the influence of the unconscious mind on behavior.
- Freud believed that thehuman mind was composedof three elements: the id, ego, and superego.
- Psychoanalytic – Sigmund Freud
- Studies the unconscious mind.
In psychology, the unconscious refers to the part of the mind that contains thoughts, memories, feelings, and desires that are not in our immediate awareness, but still influence our behavior.
Freud’s division of the mind:
Conscious – what we are aware of right now
Preconscious – memories we can recall if needed
Unconscious – hidden thoughts and feelings that influence us
Division of Mind
Conscious – You are aware of listening to the teacher and taking notes right now.
Preconscious – You remember the answer to a question when asked, even though you weren’t thinking about it before. It’s accessible memory.
Unconscious – You feel nervous about the upcoming exam, but you don’t know exactly why. Later, you realize it’s because you had a bad experience in a previous test. That fear was hidden in your unconscious, influencing your feelings and behavior without your awareness.
| Mind Level | Awareness | Access | Example |
| Conscious | Fully aware | Directly accessible | Listening to music right now |
| Subconscious | Just below awareness | Accessible with focus | Riding a bike, habits, Driving a car, Recalling a phone number, |
| Unconscious | Completely hidden | Hard to access | Repressed childhood fears influencing mood, Hidden motivations, Freudian slips: Accidentally saying something you didn’t intend to, which reveals an unconscious thought or feeling. For example, accidentally calling your new partner by your ex’s name. |
Freud’s Model of the Mind
Id – the primitive, instinctual part of the mind. It demands immediate gratification of basic desires (pleasure, food, sex).
Example: You see a delicious chocolate cake and immediately want to eat the whole thing, without thinking about consequences.
Ego – the rational, decision-making part. It tries to balance the desires of the id with reality.
Example: Your ego says, “I can have a piece of cake now, but not the whole cake, or I’ll feel sick and upset others.”
Superego – the moral conscience, representing rules, ethics, and societal expectations.
Example: Your superego adds, “Eating cake before dinner is bad behavior; I should wait.”
Freud’s Model of the Mind – Sigmund Freud’s three components of the human psyche
According to Freud, the mind is divided into id (instincts), ego (reality), and superego (morality). Our thoughts and actions result from the interaction and conflict among these three.
- Behaviorism – John Watson and B.F. Skinner (Burrhus Frederic Skinner)
- Focuses on observable behavior.
- Suggests that all behavior can be explained by environmental causes rather than by internal forces.
- Theories of learning including classical conditioning and operant conditioning were the focusof a great deal of research.
- An approach to psychology that combines elementsof philosophy, methodology, and theory.
- Psychology should concern itself with the observable behavior of people and animals, not with unobservable events that take place in their minds.
| Feature | Classical Conditioning | Operant Conditioning |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Association between stimuli | Consequences of behavior |
| Learner’s Role | Passive | Active |
| Key Figure | Ivan Pavlov | B.F. Skinner |
| Learning Type | Reflexive | Voluntary |
| Example | Dog salivates at bell | Child rewarded for homework |
Explanation:
The table highlights the key differences between the two learning theories:
- Focus: Classical conditioning focuses on associating a neutral stimulus with a naturally occurring stimulus to elicit a response. Operant conditioning focuses on how consequences (rewards and punishments) influence behavior.
- Learner’s Role: In classical conditioning, the learner is passive, simply reacting to stimuli. In operant conditioning, the learner is active, engaging in behaviors to receive rewards or avoid punishments.
- Key Figures: Ivan Pavlov is the key figure in classical conditioning, while B.F. Skinner is the key figure in operant conditioning.
- Learning Type: Classical conditioning involves reflexive or involuntary responses, while operant conditioning involves voluntary behaviors.
- Example: A classic example of classical conditioning is Pavlov’s dog, which learned to salivate at the sound of a bell that was associated with food. An example of operant conditioning is a child being rewarded for completing their homework, which increases the likelihood of them doing their homework in the future.
Attitude and Character
Attitude
Definition: A person’s feelings, thoughts, or opinions about something or someone.
Focus: Internal mindset that can influence behavior.
Example: Feeling kindness toward others, having a positive attitude toward learning, or being skeptical of news articles.
Not always visible, but it often shapes behavior.
Character
Definition: The moral and ethical qualities of a person; a combination of traits that define their personality and integrity.
Focus: Who the person is at their core, often revealed over time through consistent behavior.
Example: Honesty, courage, loyalty, responsibility.
-Character is long-term and stable, not just a single action.
- Cognitivism – Ulric Neisser,
While Neisser is the primary proponent, cognitivism was also shaped by: - Jean Piaget – cognitive development in children
- Noam Chomsky – language and mental structures (challenged behaviorism)
- George A. Miller – memory and information processing (e.g., “7±2” rule)
- The school of psychology that studies mental processes including how people think, perceive, remember and learn.
- As part of the larger field of cognitive science, this branchof psychology is related to other disciplines including neuroscience, philosophy, and linguistics.
- Focuses on the “inner workings of the mind” rather than just observable behavior
Major Theorists:
Jean Piaget – Cognitive development stages in children (sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, formal operational).
Jerome Bruner – Emphasized discovery learning and scaffolding.
David Ausubel – Highlighted meaningful learning and the importance of prior knowledge.
Lev Vygotsky – Social interaction and language as tools for cognitive development (Zone of Proximal Development).
4th Grading Disciplines and Ideas in the Social Sciences
Competency
5. Rational Choice predict the social consequences of decision making based on scarcityHUMSS_DIS 11-IVa-6
6. Institutionalism examine the constitutive nature of informal and formal institutions and their actors and how it constrains social behavior HUMSS_DIS 11-IVb-7
7. Feminist Theorydetermine the relationship between gender ideology and gender inequalityHUMSS_DIS 11-IVc-8
8. Hermeneutical Phenomenologyanalyze significance of dataHUMSS_DIS 11-IVd-9
Human-Environment Systems9.1. distinguish the ways by which human-environment interactions shape cultural and natural landscapes9.2. interpret thematic and mental maps to understand landscape changes and an individual’s sense of place9.3. explain environmental and social issues through the analysis of spatial distributions and spatial processesHUMSS_DIS 11-IVd-10
Reporting. (first Batch)
WHAT is this?
Rational choice Theory (Makatwirang Pagpili) theory banks on the key idea that humans are actively calculating the pros and cons of a particular choice, which affects the behaviors that they exhibit. These choices are often determined by an individual preferences and the extent by which he or she perceives them as immediate needs or wants. This theory remains relevant today in providing an analytical lens (pananaw na pag susuri) for understanding the choice that humans make especially with regard to deviant use.
CLICK HERE TAGALOG -Teorya ng Makatuwirang Pagpili
Teorya ng Makatuwirang Pagpili – ay nakasalalay sa pangunahing ideya na ang mga tao ay aktibong kinakalkula ang mga kalamangan at kahinaan ng isang partikular na pagpipilian, na nakakaapekto sa mga pag-uugali na kanilang ipinapakita. Ang mga pagpipiliang ito ay madalas na tinutukoy ng mga personal na kagustuhan ng isang indibidwal at ang lawak kung saan nakikita niya ang mga ito bilang agarang pangangailangan o mga bagay na gusto lamang. Ang teoryang ito ay nananatiling mahalaga ngayon sa pagbibigay ng isang analitikal na lente para sa pag-unawa sa mga pagpipilian na ginagawa ng mga tao lalo na patungkol sa mga paglihis sa pamantayan.
What is Rational Choice Theory or RCT?
Rational choice theory is a framework for understanding and often modeling social and economic behavior. It posits that individuals make decisions by rationally weighing costs and benefits to maximize their utility or self-interest.
Ang teorya ng makatuwirang pagpili ay isang balangkas para sa pag-unawa at madalas na pagmomodelo ng panlipunan at pang-ekonomiyang pag-uugali. Ipinapalagay nito na ang mga indibidwal ay gumagawa ng mga desisyon sa pamamagitan ng makatuwirang pagtimbang ng mga gastos at benepisyo upang mapakinabangan ang kanilang kapakinabangan o pansariling interes.
Additional concept of RCT.
Rational choice theory posits that human behavior is the result of individuals actively weighing the pros and cons of different choices. These choices are influenced by personal preferences and how individuals perceive their immediate needs and wants. The theory is used to analyze human decision-making, especially in understanding deviant behavior.
In order to understand institutionalism, it is important to first define institutions in this theoretical perspective. Institutions are patterns, norms rules and schemes that govern and direct social thought and action. Institutionalism, therefore, is an approach that aims to understand and analyze how actions, thoughts, and meanings penetrate into the social consciousness deeply enough to embed themselves into social psyche. There are different types of institutionalism, but their common concern is to find out the effects of these institutions and determine how these affect the manner by which the society functions.
Institutions provide social legitimacy and survival through Isomorphism. Isomorphism refers to the similarity in form, shape or structure. Institutions arise, change, and persist due to their regulative, normative and cognitive functions. These functions are isomorphic in nature as they adopt in form, shape or structure to provide social legitimacy, survival or both.
Three functions of Isomorphism:
regulative function operates through coercive isomorphism, which places value on expediency as effect of compliance. Change either happens or not depending on external factors such as rules and laws. (See the explanation)
normative function operates through normative isomorphism, which places value on complying with social obligations. Change either happens or not depending on external factors such as accreditation’s and certifications. (See the Explanation)
cognitive function operates through mimetic isomorphism, which places value on factors such as uncertainty and prevalence of others‟ performance. (See the Explanation)
CLICK HERE TAGALOG 3 functions of Isomorphism
Tatlong tungkulin ng Isomorphism:
- 1. ang tungkuling regulative ay gumagana sa pamamagitan ng coercive isomorphism, na nagbibigay halaga sa pagiging praktikal bilang epekto ng pagsunod. Ang pagbabago ay nangyayari o hindi depende sa mga panlabas na salik tulad ng mga patakaran at batas.
Ang coercive isomorphism ay isang konsepto sa organizational theory na naglalarawan ng isang sitwasyon kung saan ang isang organisasyon ay napipilitang maging katulad ng iba dahil sa panlabas na presyon, tulad ng mga batas, regulasyon, o iba pang uri ng mandato. Sa madaling salita, ang mga organisasyon ay nagbabago para sumunod sa mga external na requirement para maiwasan ang mga parusa o makakuha ng mga benepisyo.
Mga Susing Katangian ng Coercive Isomorphism:
- 1. Panlabas na Presyon: Ito ang pangunahing nagtutulak ng pagbabago. Ang presyon ay maaaring galing sa gobyerno, mga ahensya ng regulasyon, o kahit sa mga dominanteng organisasyon sa isang industriya.
- 2. Pagiging Sumusunod: Ang pokus ay nasa pagsunod sa mga patakaran at regulasyon. Hindi gaanong mahalaga kung ang mga pagbabago ay talagang nagpapabuti sa performance ng organisasyon.
- 3. Pag-iwas sa Parusa o Pagkakamit ng Benepisyo: Ang mga organisasyon ay sumusunod para maiwasan ang multa, pagkawala ng lisensya, o para makakuha ng mga insentibo tulad ng subsidies o accreditation.
- 4. Pagiging Pare-pareho: Dahil sa pare-parehong panlabas na presyon, ang mga organisasyon sa isang partikular na sektor ay nagiging mas magkakatulad sa kanilang istruktura at mga proseso.
Mga Halimbawa ng Coercive Isomorphism:
- 1. Mga Regulasyon sa Kalikasan: Ang mga kumpanya ay kailangang sumunod sa mga environmental regulations para maiwasan ang multa. Ito ay nagreresulta sa pag-adopt ng mga parehong teknolohiya at proseso para sa waste management at pollution control.
- 2. Mga Pamantayan sa Kalusugan at Kaligtasan: Ang mga ospital ay kailangang sumunod sa mga pamantayan sa kalusugan at kaligtasan para mapanatili ang kanilang accreditation. Ito ay nagreresulta sa pag-adopt ng mga parehong protocols at procedures para sa infection control at patient safety.
- 3. Mga Batas sa Accounting: Ang mga kumpanya ay kailangang sumunod sa mga standardized accounting practices para maging compliant sa mga batas sa buwis. Ito ay nagreresulta sa paggamit ng mga parehong accounting software at reporting methods.
Sa madaling salita, ang coercive isomorphism ay tungkol sa “sapilitang” pagiging pareho dahil sa mga panlabas na patakaran at regulasyon na kailangang sundin ng mga organisasyon.
- 2. ang tungkuling normative ay gumagana sa pamamagitan ng normative isomorphism, na nagbibigay halaga sa pagsunod sa mga obligasyong panlipunan. Ang pagbabago ay nangyayari o hindi depende sa mga panlabas na salik tulad ng mga akreditasyon at sertipikasyon.
- Ang normative isomorphism ay isang konsepto sa organizational theory na tumutukoy sa proseso kung saan ang mga organisasyon ay nagiging magkakatulad dahil sa mga pamantayan (norms) at mga gawi na itinuturing na katanggap-tanggap at propesyonal sa loob ng isang partikular na larangan o industriya. Ito ay nagaganap sa pamamagitan ng mga proseso ng propesyonalisasyon at networking.
- Susing Elemento ng Normative Isomorphism:
- Propesyonalisasyon: Ito ay tumutukoy sa pagtatatag ng mga pamantayan at kasanayan sa pamamagitan ng edukasyon, pagsasanay, at mga organisasyon ng mga propesyonal. Halimbawa, ang mga doktor, abogado, accountant, at iba pang mga propesyonal ay sumusunod sa mga code of ethics at mga pamantayan ng kasanayan na itinatakda ng kanilang mga propesyonal na organisasyon.
- Networking: Ang mga organisasyon ay nagiging magkakatulad sa pamamagitan ng mga network ng mga relasyon sa pagitan ng mga lider, mga empleyado, at mga miyembro ng board of directors. Ang mga ideya at mga kasanayan ay kumakalat sa pamamagitan ng mga network na ito, na humahantong sa pag-adopt ng mga parehong pamamaraan at estratehiya.
- Pamantayan ng Industriya: Ang mga organisasyon ay nag-aadopt ng mga pamantayan at mga gawi na itinuturing na “best practices” sa kanilang industriya. Ito ay maaaring mangyari sa pamamagitan ng benchmarking, pag-aaral mula sa mga lider sa industriya, at paglahok sa mga trade association.
- Legitimacy: Ang pagsunod sa mga pamantayan ay nagbibigay sa mga organisasyon ng legitimacy o pagiging katanggap-tanggap sa mata ng publiko, mga investor, at iba pang mga stakeholder.
- Mga Halimbawa ng Normative Isomorphism:
- 1. Mga Unibersidad: Ang mga unibersidad ay nagiging magkakatulad sa kanilang mga kurikulum, mga pamantayan ng pananaliksik, at mga proseso ng accreditation dahil sa mga pamantayan na itinatakda ng mga propesyonal na organisasyon at mga ahensya ng accreditation.
- 2. Mga Ospital: Ang mga ospital ay nag-aadopt ng mga parehong pamamaraan para sa patient care, infection control, at risk management dahil sa mga pamantayan na itinatakda ng mga medikal na propesyonal at mga ahensya ng regulasyon.
- 3. Mga Kumpanya ng Accounting: Ang mga kumpanya ng accounting ay sumusunod sa mga standardized accounting practices na itinatakda ng mga propesyonal na organisasyon tulad ng AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants).
- Sa madaling salita, ang normative isomorphism ay tungkol sa pagiging pareho dahil sa mga “pamantayan” at “best practices” na itinuturing na katanggap-tanggap at propesyonal sa isang partikular na larangan o industriya.
- 3. ang tungkuling cognitive ay gumagana sa pamamagitan ng mimetic isomorphism, na nagbibigay halaga sa mga salik tulad ng kawalan ng katiyakan at paglaganap ng pagganap ng iba.
Ang mimetic isomorphism ay ang proseso kung saan ang isang organisasyon ay ginagaya o kinokopya ang mga practices ng ibang organisasyon na itinuturing nilang matagumpay, lalo na kung nahaharap sila sa mga sitwasyon ng kawalan ng katiyakan o mga problemang walang malinaw na solusyon. Ito ay isang konsepto sa ilalim ng institutional theory na nagpapaliwanag kung bakit nagiging magkakatulad ang mga organisasyon sa isang field.
Narito ang mga pangunahing punto tungkol sa mimetic isomorphism:
- Pag-gaya dahil sa kawalan ng katiyakan: Madalas itong nangyayari kapag ang isang organisasyon ay hindi sigurado kung paano magtagumpay o malutas ang isang problema. Sa ganitong sitwasyon, titingin sila sa ibang mga organisasyon na tila matagumpay at gagayahin ang kanilang mga practices.
- Pagkuha ng legitimacy: Bukod sa pagiging epektibo, ginagawa rin ito ng mga organisasyon upang magkaroon ng legitimacy o pagtanggap sa kanilang field. Sa pamamagitan ng pag-gaya sa mga tinatanggap na practices, nagpapakita sila na sumusunod sila sa mga pamantayan at inaasahan ng industriya.
- Pagkakapareho ng mga organisasyon: Ang mimetic isomorphism ay nagreresulta sa pagkakapareho ng mga organisasyon sa isang partikular na sektor o industriya. Ito ay dahil maraming organisasyon ang gumagaya sa parehong mga “matagumpay” na practices.
- Halimbawa: Ang pag-adopt ng mga ospital ng continuous quality improvement bilang isang comprehensive management program ay isang halimbawa ng mimetic isomorphism..
Mahalaga ring tandaan na ang mimetic isomorphism ay isa lamang sa tatlong uri ng isomorphism. Ang dalawa pa ay ang coercive isomorphism (kung saan ang organisasyon ay napipilitang mag-adopt ng mga practices dahil sa external pressures o regulasyon) at normative isomorphism (kung saan ang organisasyon ay nag-adopt ng mga practices batay sa shared professional values o norms)
REPORTING ( Second Batch)
Key Concepts in Institutionalism
Formal and Informal Institutions
Formal and Informal institutions can be distinguished by what rules, practices and norms they derive authority from.
Formal institutions are codified rules, policies and norms that are considered official, originating from state laws, government or organizations. Examples: constitution, official law, regulation, standards enforced by the state.
Informal institutions, on the other hand, are equally known rules and norms but are not commonly written down. Informal institutions are social practices that have been commonly viewed as acceptable and are more persistent than codified laws like that of formal institutions. Examples: Informal institutions, social norms, attitudes, traditions, self-enforced morals.
Important Theorists on Institutionalism
David Mitrany
David Mitrany (1888-1975) was a Romanian-born British scholar, historian, and political theorist. Mitrany is considered as the father of functionalism in international relations, which is classified under liberal institutionalism.
Functionalism, as applied to the study of states, proposes an alternative to territorialism, which is the foundation from which states derive their power of authority from territory. Functionalism explains that a state‟s authority lies in functions and needs, and the ability to provide for those needs. Its sees scientific knowledge and technological advancements as sources of authority from which the state can derive its power. Territory then becomes negligible and focuses instead on expertise and the ability to produce what is needed by the people or by other states.
Jean Monnet
Jean Monnet (1888-1979) was a French political economist and diplomat. As one of the originators of the European Union, he saw how the needs of the state are to be achieved through the principle of supranationality. As Mitrany argued against territory being the source of authority, Monnet used the argument to erase country borderlines.
During Monnet‟s time, coal production was abundant in Germany, which was still under the sanctions imposed by the Allies‟ victory after World War II. France at that time also needed some coal. Given the situation, Germany needed some sanctions to be lifted so as to gain some economic growth, while France needed coal to get back to its pre-war economic status.
Stephen Krasner
Stephen Krasner (born 1942) is an American professor of international relations. Krasner argues that the American government and nongovernment organizations should prioritize the stabilization of weakened states so that American interests would be protected. In order to address the continued deterioration of weaker states, he suggested creation of institutions that will allow the weaker states to enter a market democracy. Krasner also argues that the formal institutions of the U.S. come from decisions made by the president, but bureaucratic process. convey the idea that many people decided on these matters and not just the president. He holds that the president’s power to control, manipulate, and create policies is seemingly perceived as being dissipated by the bureaucratic machinery.
REPORTING 3rd Batch
Types of Institutionalism:
- Normative institutionalism– is a sociological interpretation of institutions and
holds that a “logic of appropriateness” guides the behavior of actors within an
institution. It predicts that the norms and formal rules of institutions will shape the
actions of those acting within them. - Rational Choice Institutionalism– is a theoretical approach to the study of
institutions arguing that actors use institutions to maximize their utility. However,
actors face rule-based constraints which influence their behavior. - Historical institutionalism – is a new institutionalist social science approach
that emphasizes how timing, sequences and path dependence affect institutions,
and shape social, political, economic behavior and change. - Sociological institutionalism – is a form of new institutionalism that concerns
“the way in which institutions create meaning for individuals, providing important
theoretical building blocks for normative institutionalism within political science”. - Institutional Economics – focuses on understanding the role of the evolutionary
process and the role of institutions in shaping economic behavior. - Discursive institutionalism – is an umbrella concept for approaches that
concern themselves with the substantive content of ideas and the interactive
processes of discourse in institutional context. - Constructivist institutionalism – According to multiple theorists, this is so
whether the field in question is directly denoted as or has to do more with
bringing constructivist ideas into some other field, or with bringing ideas back
into the theory in contrast against structuralist and/or system. - Feminist institutionalism – is a new institutionalist approach that looks at how
gender norms operate within institutions and how institutional processes construct and maintain gender power dynamic.
What’s More:
Answer the following questions in your activity notebook:
- What will happen to the society if there is no Institutionalism?
- Explain the different types of Institutionalism.
- How does the views of Institutionalism theorists help you as an individual?
- Why is it important for us to study Institutionalism theory?
What I Have Learned
Based from what you have learned in this lesson, write a two paragraph essay on
the benefits of the different types of Institutionalism that is applicable in your day to
day lives. Write your essay on a short bondpaper.
Rubrics:
Content-10 points
Organization of Ideas- 5 points
Format and Mechanics-5 points
Lesson 4 FEMINIST THEORY
Content Standard
The learners demonstrate an understanding of…
The emergence of the Social Sciences and the different disciplines
Key concepts and approaches in the Social Sciences
Performance Standard
The learners shall be able to…
connect the disciplines with their historical and social foundations
interpret personal and social experiences using relevant approaches in the Social Sciences
evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the approach
Most Essential Learning Competencies
Analyze the basic concepts and principles of the major social science ideas:
Feminist Theory MELCS-Pages 609-610 DISS (Week 8-10)
Learning Objectives
At the end of the module you should be able to:
- Explain feminist theory;
- Identify the key concepts and feminist theorist; and
- Express the importance of feminist theory
Directions:
Identification. Read the questions carefully. Choose your answer inside the box and
write the correct answer in your activity notebook.
| Female Feminism Feminist Theory Multicultural Feminists Gender Performativity Human Feminism Radical Libertarian Feminists Liberal Feminism |
- It holds that the patriarchal system that oppresses women must be completely eliminated and that women should be free to exercise total sexual and reproductive freedom. ___
- It refers to the belief that men and women deserve equality in all opportunities,
treatment, respect, and social rights. __ - This includes attempts to describe and explain how gender systems work, as well
as a consideration of normative or ethical issues, such as whether a society’s
gender arrangements are fair. __ - This explains how the idea of „sameness‟ could counter intuitively be used as an
instrument of oppression rather than liberation. _ - It is a social belief that supports gender inequality. It is a social divide that
establishes perceived roles for men and women and relegating them to specific
roles. __ - It is a movement that calls for an end to capitalism through a socialist reformation
of our economy. __ - It argues for equal treatment of women and disapproves discrimination based on
sex. __ - It also argues solidarity among women and acknowledges that there are
differences in human capacities that are based on sex. __ - This is a theory on the creation of gender, similar to how theatrical actors create
roles identifiable to audiences. __ - This is an individualistic form of feminist theory, which focuses on women‟s
ability to maintain their equality through their own actions and choices. __
4th Batch Reporting
What’s IN
The theory of Institutionalism allows for a discourse on how institutions affect the decision of humans within the frame of a society. Today, this theory finds its relevance in creating opportunities for growth and development among institutions whether in the macro or micro context.
What is It
First, let’s define Feminism in general. The global idea of Feminism refers to the belief that men and women deserve equality in all opportunities, treatment, respect, and social rights. In general, Feminists are people who try to acknowledge social inequality based on gender and stop it from continuing. Feminists point out that in most cultures throughout history men have received more opportunities than women.
While this basic idea of Feminism seems simple enough, there are many people who misunderstand what the goal of Feminism is. Some people imagine that all Feminists are angry, bitter women who only want to subjugate men! Of course, this stereotype offends actual Feminists. Why is there such a big difference between stereotype and reality when it comes to Feminists? One of the reasons for this discrepancy might be because there are, in fact, lots of different, specific types of Feminism. Let‟s cover four of those types now – Radical Feminism, Socialist Feminism, Cultural Feminism, and Liberal Feminism. Maybe you are a Feminist, and you didn’t even know it!
Feminist theory includes attempts to describe and explain how gender systems work, as well as a consideration of normative or ethical issues, such as whether a society’s gender arrangements are fair.
Feminist theory is a major branch within sociology that shifts its assumptions, analytic lens, and topical focus away from the male viewpoint and experience toward that of women. In doing so, Feminist theory shines a light on social problems, trends, and issues that are otherwise overlooked or misidentified by the historically dominant male perspective within social theory.
Feminist theory encompasses a range of ideas, reflecting the diversity of women worldwide. Feminism counters traditional philosophy with new ways of addressing issues affecting humanity, calling for the replacement of the presiding patriarchal order with a system that emphasizes equal rights, justice, and fairness.
Liberal feminists cite women‟s oppression as rooted in social, political, and legal constraints.
Radical Libertarian Feminists hold that the patriarchal system that oppresses women must be completely eliminated and that women should be free to exercise total sexual and reproductive freedom.
Radical Cultural Feminists urge women to extricate themselves from the institution of compulsory heterosexuality.
Marxist–socialist feminists claim it is impossible for anyone, especially women, to achieve true freedom in a class-based society. Multicultural feminists explain how the idea of „sameness‟ could counter intuitively be used as an instrument of oppression rather than liberation. Postmodern feminists challenge Western dualistic thinking.
Global feminists stress the universal interests of women worldwide. Eco feminists focus on the connection among humans to the nonhuman world. Feminist theory has impacted virtually all structures, systems, and disciplines, challenging traditional ontological and epistemological assumptions about human nature as well as „maleness‟ and „femaleness.‟ Modern feminism, which began 200 years ago, has evolved in three waves. The first wave dealt with suffrage; the second centered on equal access; and the current wave is focusing on global equality.
Feminism studies gender and its relation to power, and the dynamics these two concepts play out in economics, politics, sexuality, race and nationality among others. It is both a sociological perspective and a philosophy that aims to promote gender equality, social justice, and women‟s rights. However, the primary concern that feminism tries to address is the oppression of women in society and the patriarchal structure of most societies. Patriarchy, in its most basic sense, is a social organization wherein the father or eldest male heads a society or government. The head of the family is the father, and the mother is subordinate to the decisions of the father. In some contexts, however, patriarchy constructs a social structure where men are seen as more powerful than women.
5th Batch Reporting
Key Concepts in Feminism
Gender Ideology and Inequality
Gender ideology is a social belief that supports gender inequality. It is a social divide that establishes perceived roles for men and women and relegating them to specific roles. Some gender ideologies include women staying at home while men go to work, and women being more delicate, emotional, and nurturing compared to men who are more aggressive, assertive, and dominant. Gender ideology is also actualized in how toys are determined for children. Typically, action figures are supposed to be played by boys and dolls are to be played by girls. A boy playing with a doll is ridiculed as being gay, while a girl playing action figures is teased as a lesbian.
Gender inequality is the actualization or realization of gender ideology. There is gender inequality when the perceived role of women subordination to men reflects hiring procedures and requirements. For example, a secretarial post accepting only female applicants. Salaries are also unequal when it comes to
men and women.
Four types of feminism
Radical feminism is a movement that believes sexism is so deeply rooted in society that the only cure is to eliminate the concept of gender completely. Radical feminists suggest changes, such as finding technology that will allow babies to be grown outside of a woman’s body, to promote more equality between men and women. This will allow women to avoid missing work for maternity leave, which radical feminists argue is one reason women aren’t promoted as quickly as men. In fact, radical feminists would argue that the entire traditional family system is sexist. Men are expected to work outside the home
while women are expected to care for children and clean the house. Radical feminists note that this traditional dichotomy maintains men as economically in power over women, and therefore, the traditional family structure should be rejected.
Socialist feminism is slightly less extreme but still calls for major social change. Socialist feminism is a movement that calls for an end to capitalism through a socialist reformation of our economy. Basically, socialist feminism argues that capitalism strengthens and supports the sexist status quo because men are the ones who currently have power and money. Those men are more willing to share their power and money with other men, which means that women are continually given fewer opportunities and resources. This keeps women under the control of men. In short, socialist feminism focuses on economics and politics.
Cultural feminism is a movement that pointsout how modern society is hurt by encouraging
masculine behavior, but society would benefit by encouraging feminine behavior instead. This
also refers to the philosophy that men and women have different approaches to the world around them, and that greater value should be placed on the way women approach the world. In some cases, cultural feminism argues that a woman‟s way of looking at the world is actually superior to men.
Liberal feminism is an individualistic form of feminist theory, which focuses on women’s ability to maintain their equality through their own actions and choices. Liberal feminism’s primary goal is
gender equality in the public sphere, such as equal access to education, equal pay, ending job
sex segregation. It is broadly accepted that the proposition of contemporary advanced industrial
societies are meritocratic, and that women as a group are not innately less.
6th Batch Reporting
Important Theorists in Feminism
Mary Wollstonecraft (1759–1797) was an English writer, philosopher, and women’s rights advocate. Wollstonecraft advocated that the human rights written by John Locke also be accorded to women. Although Locke’s human rights did not discriminate sexes, their application during that time was relegated only to men. Wollstonecraft thus, argued that women should also have the right to life, property, pursuit of happiness and suffrage.
Nancy Cott (born 1945) is an American historian and professor. Cott traced the historical roots of the feminist movement in America and identified its paradoxes, struggles, and periods of decline. One paradox by Cott was the rise of two feminist ideologies-human feminism and female feminism. Human feminism argues for equal treatment of women and disapproves discrimination based on sex. Female
feminism, on the other hand, argues solidarity among women and acknowledges that there are differences in human capacities that are based on sex.
Click Here – Two feminist ideologies-human feminism and female feminism
two feminist ideologies-human feminism and female feminism – “Human feminism” and “female feminism” are distinct ideological frameworks within the broader feminist movement, primarily differing on whether gender equality should be based on the sameness or the differences between men and women.
- Human Feminism (Equality Feminism): This ideology, often associated with Liberal Feminism, argues that men and women are essentially the same as human beings. It emphasizes:
- Universal Human Rights: The belief that rights should be granted based on shared humanity rather than biological sex.
- Legal & Institutional Reform: Focuses on removing legal barriers (such as seeking Equal Pay or voting rights) to ensure women have the same opportunities as men.
- Anti-Essentialism: Rejects the idea that women have “natural” inclinations for certain roles (like caretaking), asserting that such traits are socially constructed.
- Female Feminism (Difference or Cultural Feminism): This ideology, frequently linked to Cultural Feminism, argues that there are fundamental, distinct “female” qualities that should be celebrated rather than erased. It emphasizes:
- The “Female Essence”: Focuses on reclaiming and elevating traditionally undervalued feminine traits, such as nurturing, peace-seeking, and cooperativeness.
- Celebration of Difference: Argues that striving for “sameness” with men actually devalues women by forcing them to conform to masculine standards.
- Restructuring Society: Rather than just entering existing male-dominated systems, it suggests society should be restructured to prioritize feminine values.
Which of these frameworks—focusing on equal rights regardless of sex or valuing the unique differences of women—resonates more with your interests?
Adrienne Rich (1929–2012) was an American poet, and feminist. She used poetry to bring to light the oppression of women and lesbians in society. Her poems explored themes such as women‟s roles in society, racism, and war. Her collection of poetry, “Diving Into the Wreck”, garnered wide praise and accolades. In her essay, “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence”, Rich defined how heterosexuality becomes an alienating and oppressing concept that only lends to the establishment of male dominance over women. Rich defined being a lesbian as more than a sexual
preference, but a cumulative lived experience of women and their history.
Judith Butler (born 1956) is an American philosopher and gender theorist, whose key idea is her theory of Gender Performativity. Gender performativity is a theory on the creation of gender similar to how theatrical actors create roles identifiable to audiences. Butler claims that gender is an action which is separable from the actor. Gender is performative in a sense that gender roles and norms have already been established in society throughouthistory. Humans are so accustomed to these traditions that we associate certain acts to a particular gender. For Butler, gender is not a pre- established identity, but an act of existing in as much. Gender is a choice- a choice to act according to how society established norms of masculinity or femininity.
Patricia Hill Collins (born 1948) is an American sociologist. Her work studies feminism in the perspective of a black woman. Collins argues that different oppressions happen within the context of race, gender and class and that there are overlapping instances of oppression. Collins claims that knowing the point of view of a black woman’s struggle and feminism can provide a window for other similarlyoppressed groups or individuals. She also argues that the dynamics of oppression must be seen from all angles, and not simply on one form or factor of oppression.
Ayn Rand (1905–1982) was an American novelist, philosopher, and playwright. Calling her philosophy objectivism. She aimed to use reason in order to achieve personal happiness. Her theories and arguments were not limited within the confines of the feminist agenda, but encompassed all of human existence. She did not identify differences between genders because she talked about universalities such as human rights. Objectivism, in particular, is living for one‟s own sake without sacrificing himself or herself for
another. It is a philosophy determined to find personal truth and fulfill without the use of force or violence. She is considered a feminist due to her stance that all human beings are equal- equal in their
pursuit of self-interests and equal in upholding their rights.
Activity 2:
Editorial Cartooning
Materials needed: pencil, crayons, activity notebook
Directions: Create an editorial cartoon showing Gender Ideology in your activity notebook.
Rubrics/Criteria
Relevance to the theme – 40pts
Originality – 35pts
Impact (neatness,harmony,
Color presentation – 25 pts
TOTAL 100 pts.
What’s More
Answer the following questions in your activity notebook:
- How does Gender Ideology affect our society?
- Have you experienced being unfairly treated? Under what circumstance/s? How
did you handle it? - As a student, how can you promote gender equality in your family? In the
society?
What I Have Learned
Read the poem and answer the questions that follow. Write your answers in
your activity notebook.
I Stay at Home
| A Social Justice Poem by Guy Farmer
Brother goes off to school
While I stay at home
Tending to the boiling pot
On the stove, scrubbing the
Floor to a fine shine,
Cleaning the streaks off the windows,
Dreaming of being in a classroom
Traveling to colorful new worlds.
- Who do you think is the persona of the poem, I Stay at Home?
- What do you think is the poem all about?
- Do you agree with the idea of the persona, staying at home?
- What can you do to change the society‟s traditional culture of gender
inequality?
What I Can Do
What is Institutionalism?
How important is Institutionalism in our daily life?
Assessment
Direction: Identification. Read the following questions carefully. Choose your answer from the
word pool below. Write your answers in your activity notebook.
| Female Feminism Feminist Theory Multicultural Feminists Gender Performativity Human Feminism Radical Libertarian Feminists Liberal feminism |
- It is a movement that calls for an end to capitalism through a socialist reformation of our economy. __
- It argues for equal treatment of women and disapproves discrimination based on sex. __
- It also argues solidarity among women and acknowledges that there are differences in human capacities that are based on sex. __
- This is a theory on the creation of gender similar to how theatrical actors create roles identifiable to audiences. __
- This is an individualistic form of feminist theory, which focuses on women’s ability to maintain their equality through their own actions and choices.
- It holds that the patriarchal system that oppresses women must be completely eliminated and that women should be free to exercise total sexual and reproductive freedom. ___
- It refers to the belief that men and women deserve equality in all opportunities, treatment, respect, and social rights. __
- This includes attempts to describe and explain how gender systems work, as well as a consideration of normative or ethical issues, such as whether a society’s gender arrangements are fair. __
- This explains how the idea of „sameness‟ could counter intuitively be used as a instrument of oppression rather than liberation.
- .It is a social belief that supports gender inequality. It is a social divide that establishes perceived roles for men and women and relegating them to specific roles. ___
Additional Activities
Choose three (3) significant women that have a great impact in your life, and explain
how they have inspired you as a student. Write answer in your activity notebook.
Glossary
- Cognitive function – operates through mimetic isomorphism, which places value on factors such as uncertainly and prevalence of others‟ performance.
- Feminist institutionalism – is a new institutionalist approach that looks at how gender norms operate within institutions and how institutional processes construct and maintain gender power dynamics.
- Institutions – are patterns, norms rules and schemes that govern and direct social thought and action.
- Institutionalism – is an approach that aims to understand and analyze how actions, thoughts, and meanings penetrate into the social consciousness deeply enough to embed themselves into social psyche.
- Isomorphism – refer to the similarity in form, shape or structure. Institutions arise, change, and persist due to their regulative, normative and cognitive functions. These functions are isomorphic in nature as they adopt in form, shape or structure to provide social legitimacy, survival or both.
- Regulative function – operates through coercive isomorphism, which places value on expediency as effect of compliance. Change either happens or not depending on external factors such as rules and laws.
- Sociological institutionalism – is a form of new institutionalism that concerns “the way in which institutions create meaning for individuals, providing important theoretical building blocks for normative institutionalism within political science”.
Disciplines and Ideas in the Social Sciences
Quarter 2– Module 10:
HERMENUETICAL PHENOMENOLOGY
Lesson 5 HERMENUETICAL PHENOMENOLOGY
Content Standard
The learners demonstrate an understanding of…
The emergence of the Social Sciences and the different disciplines
Key concepts and approaches in the Social Sciences
Performance Standard
The learners shall be able to…
connect the disciplines with their historical and social foundations
interpret personal and social experiences using relevant approaches in the
Social Sciences
evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the approach
Most Essential Learning Competencies
Analyze the basic concepts and principles of the major social science ideas:
Institutionalism MELCS-Pages 609-610 DISS (Week 8-10)
Learning Objectives
At the end of the module you should be able to:
- Define Hermeneutical Phenomenology;
- Identify the key concepts and principles of Hermeneutical Phenomenology; and
- Express the importance of Hermeneutical Phenomenology
What I Know
Identification:
Directions: Read the questions carefully, and choose your answer from the word
pool below. Write your answers in your activity notebook.
| Phenomenology Hermeneutics Literal Descriptive Phenomenology Hermeneutics Allegorical Hermeneutics Hermeneutics Moral Martin Heidegger Genetic Phenomenology Hermeneutical Phenomenology Interpretative Phenomenology |
- It is the study of ―phenomena ―: appearances of things, or things as they appear
in our experience, or the ways in which we experience things, thus the meanings
that things have in our experience. - This is the theory and methodology of interpretation, especially the interpretation
of biblical texts, wisdom literature, and philosophical texts. - It is a philosophy of and a method for interpreting human experiences as a
means to understand the question of what it is to be human. - This seeks to establish exegetical principles by which ethical lessons may be
drawn from the various parts of the Bible. - He is best known for contributions to phenomenology, hermeneutics, and
existentialism. - Is an approach to psychological qualitative research with an idiographic focus,
which means that it aims to offer insights into how a given person, in a given
context, makes sense of a given phenomenon. - It is widely used in social science research as a method to explore and describe
the lived experience of individuals. - This refers to the interpretation which asserts that a biblical text is to be
interpreted according to the ―plain meaning ― conveyed by its grammatical
construction and historical context. - This is a third type of hermeneutics that interprets the biblical narratives as
having a second level of reference beyond those persons, things, and events
explicitly mentioned in the text. - .A type of Phenomenology that studies the emergence/genesis of meanings of
things within one’s own stream of experience.
What’s In
What are the differences between gender ideology and gender inequality?
How will you promote gender equality in our society?
7th Batch Reporting
What is It
Hermeneutics is the theory and methodology of interpretation, especially the interpretation of biblical texts, wisdom literature, and philosophical texts. Hermeneutics is more than interpretive principles or methods used when immediate comprehension fails and includes the art of understanding and communication.
This is also the branch of knowledge that deals with interpretation, especially of the Bible or literary texts. The primary need of Hermeneutics is to determine and understand the meaning of Biblical text. The purpose of Hermeneutics is to bridge the gap between our minds and the minds of the Biblical writers through a thorough knowledge of the original languages, ancient history and the comparison of Scripture with Scripture.
In the history of biblical interpretation, four major types of hermeneutics have
emerged: the literal, moral, allegorical, and anagogical. Literal interpretation asserts
that a biblical text is to be interpreted according to the ―plain meaning‖ conveyed by
its grammatical construction and historical context.
- Hermeneutics Literal interpretation asserts that a biblical text is to be interpreted according to the ―plain meaning‖ conveyed by its grammatical construction and historical context. The literal meaning is held to correspond to the intention of the authors.
- Hermeneutics Moral which seeks to establish exegetical principles by which ethical lessons may be drawn from the various parts of the Bible.
- Allegorical Hermeneutics a third type of hermeneutics, interprets the biblical narratives as having a second level of reference beyond those persons, things, and events explicitly mentioned in the text.
- Interpretation Hermeneutics. This mode of interpretation seeks to explain biblical events as they relate to or prefigure the life to come.
Friedrich Schleiermacher, also known as the father of modern theology, andrecently the father of modern hermeneutics, took the theory of interpretation onto a whole new level. He transformed the traditional Biblical hermeneutics into a general hermeneutic which incorporated texts of all kinds.
Hermeneutics is the theory and methodology of interpretation, especially the interpretation of biblical texts, wisdom literature, and philosophical texts. Indeed, it is the science and art of Biblical interpretation. It is a science because it is guided by rules within a system; and it is an art because the application of the rules is by skill, and not by mechanical imitation.
Phenomenology (from Greek phainómenon ―that which appears ― and lógos ―study ―) is the philosophical study of the structures of experience and consciousness. As a philosophical movement it was founded in the early years of the 20th century by Edmund Husserl and was later expanded upon by a circle of his followers at the universities of Göttingen and Munich in Germany.
The science of phenomena as distinct from that of the nature of being. An approach that concentrates on the study of consciousness and the objects of direct experience. Literally, phenomenology is the study of ―phenomena ―: appearances of things, or things as they appear in our experience, or the ways we experience things, thus the meanings things have in our experience.
Phenomenology studies conscious experience as experienced from the subjective or first person point of view. It is a broad discipline and method of inquiry in philosophy, developed largely by the German philosophers Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger, which is based on the premise that reality consists of objects and events (―phenomena ―) as they are perceived or understood in the human consciousness. Phenomenology, as a method has four characteristics, namely: descriptive, reduction, essence and intentionality. to investigate as it happens.
Observations ensure that the form of the description are the things themselves. We
can use the historical perspective to clarify the earlier statement that there are
several types of phenomenology.
Phenomenology is concerned about reduction, a way of bracketing our
experience of being in the world so as to let us encounter the phenomena, presence,
and the being of life in the world itself.
8th Batch Reporting
HERMENUETICS PHILOSOPHERS:
1. Martin Heidegger was a German philosopher and a seminal thinker in the Continental tradition of philosophy. He is best known for contributions to phenomenology, hermeneutics, and existentialism. In Being and Time (1927), Heidegger addresses the meaning of ―being‖ by considering the question, ―what is common to all entities that makes them entities? ―Heidegger approaches this question through an analysis of Dasein, his term for the specific type of being that humans possess, and which he associates closely with his concept of ―being-in-the-world‖ (In-der-Welt-sein).This conception of the human is in contrast with that of Rationalist thinkers like René Descartes, who had understood human existence most basically as thinking, as in Cogito ergo sum (―I think therefore I am).
Heidegger’s later work includes criticism of the view, common in the Western tradition, that all of nature is a ―standing reserve ― on call for human purposes. Heidegger was a member and supporter of the Nazi Party. There is controversy as to the relationship between his philosophy and his Nazism.
Paul Nicolai Hartmann was a Baltic German philosopher. He is regarded as a key representative of critical realism and as one of the most important twentieth century metaphysicians. Hartmann’s ontological theory, the levels of reality are:
(1) the inorganic level
(2) the organic level
(3) the psychical/emotional and
(4) the intellectual/cultural level.
Hartmann postulates four laws that apply to the levels of reality, namely:
The law of recurrence: Lower categories recur in the higher levels as a sub-
aspect of higher categories, but never vice versa.
The law of modification: The categorial elements modify in their recurrence in the higher levels (they are shaped by the characteristics of the higher levels).
The law of the novum: The higher category is composed of a diversity of lower elements, but it is a specific novum that is not included in the lower levels.
The law of distance between levels: Since the different levels do not develop continuously but in leaps, they can be clearly distinguished.
The central concept of Hartmann’s ethical theory is that of a value. Hartmann’s 1926 book, Ethik, elaborates a material ethics of value according to which moral knowledge is achieved through phenomenological investigation into our experiences of values. Moral phenomena is understood by Hartmann to be experiences of a realm of being which is distinct from that of material things, namely, the realm of values. The values inhabiting this realm are unchanging, super-temporal, and super-
historical, though human consciousness of them shifts in focus over time. Borrowing
a style of phrase from Kant, Hartmann characterizes values as conditions of the possibility of goods; in other words, values are what make it possible for situations in the world to be good. Our knowledge of the goodness (or badness) of situations is derived from our emotional experiences of them, experiences which are made possible by a prior capacity for the appreciation of value. For Hartmann, this means
that our awareness of the value of a state of affairs is not arrived at through a process of reasoning, but rather, by way of an experience of feeling, which he calls valuational consciousness. If, then, ethics is the study of what one ought to do, or what states of affairs ought to bring about, such studies, according to Hartmann, must be carried out by paying close attention to our emotional capacities to discern
what is valuable in the world. As such, Hartmann’s conception of proper moral philosophy contrasts with rationalist and formalist theories, such as Kant’s, according to which ethical knowledge is derived from purely rational principles.
2. Gabriel Honoré Marcel (1889–1973) was a French philosopher, playwright, music critic and leading Christian existentialist. The author of over a dozen books and at least thirty plays, Marcel’s work focused on the modern individual’s struggle in a technologically dehumanizing society. Though often regarded as the first French existentialist, he dissociated himself from figures such as Jean-Paul Sartre, preferring the term philosophy of existence or neo-Socrateanism to define his own thought. The Mystery of Being is a well-known two-volume workauthored by Marcel.
He is often classified as one of the earliest existentialists, although he dreaded being placed in the same category as Jean-Paul Sartre; Marcel came to prefer the label neo-Socratic (possibly because of Søren Kierkegaard, the father of Christian existentialism, who was a neo-Socratic thinker himself). While Marcel
recognized that human interaction often involved objective characterization of ―the other, he still asserted the possibility of ―communion – a state where both individuals can perceive each other’s subjectivity.
9th Bath Reporting
Two main approaches to Phenomenology:
- Descriptive Phenomenology is widely used in social science research as a method to explore and describe the lived experience of individuals. It is a philosophy and a scientific method and has undertaken many variations as it has.
- Interpretative Phenomenology is an approach to psychological qualitative research with an idiographic focus, which means that it aims to offer insights into how a given person, in a given context, makes sense of a given phenomenon.
Definitions of Terms
Absolute location: The exact position of an object or place stated in spatial coordinates of a grid system designed for locational purposes.
Anthropology: The study of humans; the social science that seeks to understand human origins and adaptation, and the diversity of cultures and worldviews.
Binary opposition: The means by which the units of language have value or meaning; each unit is defined against what it is not.
Class conflict: Conflict between entire classes over the distribution of a society’s wealth and power.
Constitutive nature: Forming an essential part or a component of.
Core values: In Sikolohiyang Pilipino, the core of Filipino personhood is the concept of “kapwa” (shared identity), associated with which are other societal values.
Discourse: A formal way of thinking expressed through language.
Economics: A social science that deals with the optimum allocation of scarce resources among its alternatives to satisfy the unlimited human wants and needs of the people.
Ego: The Freudian structure of personality that deals with the demand of reality.
Environment: Surroundings; the totality of things that in any way may affect an organism, including both physical and cultural conditions; a region characterized by a certain set of physical conditions.
Feminist theory: A theory that (1) emphasizes gender as key basis of structured inequality, (2) challenges conventional distinctions between public and private, and (3) problematizes the fundamentally political relationship between gender and power.
Formal institutional constraint: Rules, procedure, and formal political organizations (such as government).
Gender ideology: Meanings involved in the assignment of roles for women and men within the household and outside of it.
Geography: The study of the earth’s surface; a specialized investigation of the physical structure of the earth, including its terrain and its climates, and the nature and character of its contrasting inhabited portions.
Geographical imagination: A sensitivity toward the significance of place and space, landscape and nature, in the constitution and conduct of life on Earth.
History: A study of the past, one that describes/narrates and analyzes human activities in the past and the changes that these had undergone.
Hermeneutical Phenomenology/Phenomenological Hermeneutics: Historical phenomena (or the world outside) is interpreted differently in proper context through one’s consciousness.
Humanities: The study of the ways in which the human experience is processed and documented; the fields of philosophy, literature, religion, art, music, history and language.
Id: The part of personality that Freud called “it” consisting of unconscious drives; the individual’s reservoir of sexual energy.
Informal institutional constraint: Uncodified rules of conduct such as sanctions, taboos, customs, and traditions that may create and/or sustain temporary organizations in potentially underdeveloped/ immature political worlds.
Institutionalism: An approach that views institutions as humanly devised constraints that structure political, economic, and social interactions.
Institutions: Stable, recurring patterns of behavior; hence, political institutions are not the same as political organizations.
Interdisciplinary approach: A method that integrates disciplinary elements and perspectives to create a holistic view or common understanding of a complex issue or problem.
Landscape: A term referring to the appearance of an area and to the items comprising that appearance.
Latent function: The unrecognized and unintended consequence of any social pattern.
Linguistics: The scientific study of language and its structure.
Manifest function: The recognized and intended consequence of any social pattern.
Marxism: An approach that acknowledges the economic relations between classes determine/structure social and political relations.
Mental maps: A map drawn to represent the mental image a person has of an area.
Multidisciplinary approach: A method that puts together separate disciplinary perspectives side by side, adding breadth of knowledge, information, and methods; disciplines retain their separate perspectives and elements.
Pantayong Pananaw: “From-us-for-us perspective”: A communication-based framework whose aim is to produce a “national” discourse (“talastasang bayan”).
Place: A human-wrought transformation of a part of the Earth’s surface or of preexisting, undifferentiated space.
Political science: The systematic study of politics.
Politics: May be defined as (1) the art of government, (2) public affairs, (3) compromise and consensus, and (4) power.
Psychoanalysis: A theory of personality, an approach to psychotherapy, and method of investigation founded by Sigmund Freud.
Psychodynamic approach: An approach to psychology emphasizing unconscious thoughts of the person.
Psychology: The scientific study of behavior and mental processes.
Rational choice: Rational choice is a product of scarcity and demand the people to make the right and rational choice to maximize the use of its resources.
Region: The term applied to an earth area that displays a distinctive grouping of physical or cultural phenomena or is functionally united as a single organizational unit.
Relative location: The position of a place or activity in relation to other places or activities.
Scale: In cartography, the ratio between length or size of an area on a map and the actual length or size of that same area on the earth’s surface; the size of the area studied, from local to global.
Scarcity: Scarcity is a basic problem arising from unlimited wants of people with limited resources.
Site: The place where something is located; the immediate surroundings and their attributes.
Situation: The location of something in relation to the physical and human characteristics of a larger region.
Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Is a psychology of, about, and for Philippine peoples.
Social dysfunction: Any social pattern that may disrupt the operation of society.
Social function: The consequence of any social pattern for the operation of a society as a whole.
Social conflict approach: An approach that sees society as an area of inequality that generates conflict and change.
Social Science: The systematic study of various aspects of human society.
Sociology: The systematic study of human society.
Spatial distribution: The arrangement of things on the earth’s surface.
Structure: Any relatively stable pattern of social behavior
Structural functionalism: An approach that sees society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability. It looks for a structure’s social function.
Structuralism: A method for analyzing language, narratives, and cultural phenomena that uncovers basic elements that form structures (often binary oppositions).
Superego: The Freudian structure of personality that serves as the harsh internal judge of our behavior; what we often call conscience.
Symbolic interactionism: An approach that sees society as the product of the everyday interactions of individuals.
Systems Analysis: An approach to thestudy of large systems through (1) segregation of the entire system into its component parts; (2) investigation of the interactions between system elements; and (3) study of inputs, outputs, flows, interactions, and boundaries within the system.
Thematic maps: A representation of the spatial distribution of a specific phenomenon (theme) across a geographic area.
General References:
Barnard, A. (2000). History and Theory in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burnham, P., Gilland Lutz, K., Grant, W., and Layton-Henry, Z. (2008). Research Methods in Politics (2nd Edition). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Eviota, E. (1992). The Political Economy of Gender: Women and the Sexual Division of Labour in the Philippines. London and New Jersey: Zed Books Ltd.
Feist, J., Feist, G. , and Roberts, TA. (2013). Theories of Personality (8th Edition). USA: McGraw Companies, Inc.
Goodin, R. (1996). “Institutions and their Design,” in R. Goodin (ed.) The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Getis, Arthur, Judith Getis, and Jerome Fellman (1998) Introduction to Geography. USA: McGraw Hill.
Gregory, Derek, Ron Johnston, Geraldine Pratt, Michael Watts, and Sarah Whatmore (2009) The Dictionary of Human Geography. UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Heywood, A. (2013). Politics (4th Edition). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
King, L. (2013). Experience Psychology (2nd Edition). USA: McGraw Companies, Inc.
Klein, J. (2007). “Interdisciplinary Approaches in Social Science Research”, in W. Outhwaite & S. Turner (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Social Science Methodology. London: Sage Publications.
Macionis, J. (2012). Sociology (14th Edition). Singapore; Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd.
Marsh, D. (2002). “Marxism”, in D. Marsh and G. Stoker (ed). Theory and Methods on Political Science (2nd Edition). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
March, J. and Olsen, J. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions. New York: Free Press.
Navarro, A. at Lagbao-Bolante, F. (eds) (2007). Mga Babasahin sa Agham Panlipunang Pilipino: Sikolohiyang Pilipino, Pilipinolohiya at Pantayong Pananaw. Lungsod Quezon: C&E Publishing North, D.
This rubric is designed for general reports and focuses on clarity, accuracy, and completeness.
| Criteria | Points Possible | 90-100 Points (Excellent) | 80-89 Points (Good) | 70-79 Points (Fair) | Below 70 Points (Poor) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarity & Organization | 25 | Report is exceptionally clear, well-organized, and easy to follow. Uses headings, subheadings, and transitions effectively. | Report is clear and organized with a logical flow. Headings and subheadings are used appropriately. | Report is somewhat disorganized and difficult to follow at times. Headings and subheadings may be missing or used inconsistently. | Report is disorganized, unclear, and difficult to understand. Lacks logical flow and structure. |
| Accuracy of Information | 25 | Information is completely accurate, well-researched, and thoroughly supported by credible sources. Data is presented correctly and without errors. | Information is mostly accurate and supported by credible sources. Minor inaccuracies may be present. | Information contains some inaccuracies or is not consistently supported by credible sources. | Information is largely inaccurate, unreliable, or unsupported by evidence. |
| Completeness | 25 | Report is comprehensive and covers all required aspects in detail. All questions are answered thoroughly, and all relevant information is included. | Report is mostly complete and covers all major aspects. Some details may be missing or underdeveloped. | Report is incomplete and missing several key aspects. Some questions are not fully answered. | Report is significantly incomplete and fails to address many important aspects. |
| Analysis & Insight | 25 | Demonstrates exceptional analysis and insight. Provides thoughtful interpretation of information and draws well-supported conclusions. Offers original perspectives and critical evaluation. | Demonstrates good analysis and insight. Provides reasonable interpretation of information and draws logical conclusions. | Demonstrates limited analysis and insight. Interpretation of information is superficial, and conclusions may not be well-supported. | Lacks analysis and insight. Fails to interpret information or draw meaningful conclusions. |
Rubric 2: Scientific Report Rubric
This rubric is tailored for scientific reports, emphasizing methodology, data presentation, and discussion of results.
| Criteria | Points Possible | 90-100 Points (Excellent) .
- Iran Names Google, Amazon, Microsoft as Possible Targets
- Iran–Philippines Ties to Become ‘Even Brighter,’ Says Ambassador
- Iranian Community in Philippines Faces Bank, GCash Issues & Stereotypes
- Ron Angeles Sex Scandal
- Rihanna’s LA Mansion Targeted in Gunfire Attack While She Was Home
- Mojtaba Khamenei
- Vladimir Putin Welcomes Mojtaba Khamenei as Iran’s New Leader
- Oil Prices Surge as Mojtaba Khamenei Takes Power Amid Middle East Tensions
- DepEd Ipinatupad ang 4-Day Work Week
- History of Iran
Sir good morning. Waray pa amon name ma update. Indibidwal ang reporting sa monday?
DISS Disciplines and Ideas in the Social Sciences HUMSS CNHS Calubian National High School. Salamat po
Akon gin type sa google diss cnhs adto na search ko. Salamat